Quire
Content Intelligence

Your team's best work, published.

Quire reads what your people actually did — then proposes it, drafts it and publishes it. Nobody writes from a blank page.

The problem

Every week your team ships something worth writing about. A migration that taught you something. A decision you'd make differently. A result a client cares about.

It stays in Slack.

Not because nobody can write — because turning a thread, a call recording and a ticket into a publishable piece takes a senior person half a day, and that person has better things to do. So the blog goes quiet, and the expertise that would win your next conversation stays invisible.

How it works

01

It reads your actual work

Slack, meeting transcripts, delivery tickets, documents. Connected once, read continuously.

02

It proposes what's worth writing

A ranked calendar, once a week. Every story carries the evidence behind it, so you can check the claim before approving the piece.

03

It writes — you decide

A blog post and a LinkedIn post against your configured house style, with images, ready for your CMS. Approve, reject, or send back with a note.

One real week, in production

480signals scanned
123qualified against the rubric
8stories ready to write
~9 minper finished package

Measured at Axelerant, where Quire has run the weekly content cycle since before it was a product. A finished package is a blog post, a LinkedIn post and branded images.

Why this isn't another AI writer → Over the page: the part that matters, and what setup takes.
01 / 02
Quire
02 / 02

Why this isn't another AI writer

It writes from what happened, not from a prompt.

A tool handed a topic produces text that could be about any company in your category. Quire starts from the thread, the decision and the number — and cites them. Take the engagement out of the piece and there's nothing left, which is the point.

And it tells you when it can't.

If a first-hand story needs a practitioner interview that hasn't happened, Quire stops before writing and hands you the questions to ask — rather than inventing a quote to fill the gap. Same in the site audit: where no honest redirect target exists, it says so instead of pointing the link at your homepage.

A tool that never refuses is one you have to check line by line. That costs more than writing it yourself, which is why most content tools end up unused.

What you get

  • Weekly story proposals drawn from your own sources
  • Blog and LinkedIn drafts, approval-gated at every stage
  • Branded images, and publishing to HubSpot, WordPress or Drupal
  • A record of what was proposed, approved and published

What it needs from you

  • Read access to the places your work already lives
  • One onboarding session — house style, content pillars, approvers
  • Someone who says yes or no once a week

Setup is where the quality comes from. Skip it and you get competent, generic writing — which every other tool already gives you.

Also included

Technical SEO & answer-engine audit

Crawl findings turned into work you can action: the replacement title and description per page, a verified destination for every dead URL, and — for everything a rewrite can't touch — a diagnosis naming what the affected pages have in common, the ordered steps, who owns it and what it costs to leave.

Commercials

To be set. Licence plus a one-off onboarding engagement — numbers to be filled in before this reaches a prospect.
See it run on your own Slack. A 30-minute session against your sources — not a demo tenant.
Built and run by Axelerant
app.quire.team